Paul,
I'm happy to re-run last Tuesdays flight, if required. I don't think we have anything else planned.
I've made a couple of changes. I will T/O 3min30secs before No2 releases brakes.
If you agree, could you reserve Server 1 again please. I will also post a revised miz if we fly.
I fully understand if you have other plans in mind, and do not want to do Nalchik Strike again.
Standing by.
Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Flt Lt Geoff Mansfield RAF Air UK
- Richard Rodgers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 792
- Joined: 31 Dec 2012, 10:11
- Location: Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Count me in please Geoff
Gp Captain Richard Rodgers - RAF Air UK
- Paul(Dragon)0043
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: 28 Dec 2014, 10:46
- Location: Worcester, Worcestershire
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Hi Geoff, nope I've got no objection of you running Nalchick Strike again.
Paul
Paul
"Je Vois Tout"
Wing Commander Paul"Dragon"Ratcliffe - RAF AIR UK
97 Squadron
Wing Commander Paul"Dragon"Ratcliffe - RAF AIR UK
97 Squadron
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Paul,
Glad we can fly it again. I've seen your request for server 1. Once I've updated the miz, I'll repost for all to see, and for you to add to the server.
Flight line up the same as last week. Landing at Vaziani will be different, with all the flight returning safely.
Glad we can fly it again. I've seen your request for server 1. Once I've updated the miz, I'll repost for all to see, and for you to add to the server.
Flight line up the same as last week. Landing at Vaziani will be different, with all the flight returning safely.
Flt Lt Geoff Mansfield RAF Air UK
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Paul,
Here is the revised miz for Tuesday 30th. Please add to server 1.
I have made a few changes to last week, namely:-
1. Boar 1 T/O is 3mins30sec, before Boar 2.
2. Tunguska has been moved away from other radar units.
3. Fuel state for all aircraft has been lowered by 500lbs. I was tempted to lower it by 1500lbs.
4. Two passes each, over the target area are authorised, if required. After weapon release, left hand circuit onto a reciprocal heading back towards IP. Consider re-arming, and adding 500lbs of weapons.
5. A sound file has been added to confirm Tunguska has been destroyed.
Here is the revised miz for Tuesday 30th. Please add to server 1.
I have made a few changes to last week, namely:-
1. Boar 1 T/O is 3mins30sec, before Boar 2.
2. Tunguska has been moved away from other radar units.
3. Fuel state for all aircraft has been lowered by 500lbs. I was tempted to lower it by 1500lbs.
4. Two passes each, over the target area are authorised, if required. After weapon release, left hand circuit onto a reciprocal heading back towards IP. Consider re-arming, and adding 500lbs of weapons.
5. A sound file has been added to confirm Tunguska has been destroyed.
Flt Lt Geoff Mansfield RAF Air UK
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
I hope to make it to this sortie. Still trying to resolve some tech problems within my set-up, but I seem to be gradually battering them back into place.
Wing Commander Alan Johnson - RAFAir UK
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
My system should be OK for this evening.
However, having had problems releasing the bombs on the last sortie, I have set up a test run, with the same results.
Basically, the steering bar on the CCRP run is consistently to the left of the target, until I get very close when it moves rapidly to the left. As a result I am outside the 5 mil limit and the drop is aborted.
I have attached 3 HUD views at 20 secs, 10 secs and 6 secs, and the incorrect line up to the left can be seen until about 6-7 secs when the bomb fall line move sharply to the left and I can't catch it. As a result the release is aborted.
Can anyone suggest a reason for this? Otherwise I am going to have to drop in CCIP.
However, having had problems releasing the bombs on the last sortie, I have set up a test run, with the same results.
Basically, the steering bar on the CCRP run is consistently to the left of the target, until I get very close when it moves rapidly to the left. As a result I am outside the 5 mil limit and the drop is aborted.
I have attached 3 HUD views at 20 secs, 10 secs and 6 secs, and the incorrect line up to the left can be seen until about 6-7 secs when the bomb fall line move sharply to the left and I can't catch it. As a result the release is aborted.
Can anyone suggest a reason for this? Otherwise I am going to have to drop in CCIP.
- Attachments
-
- Run in 20 secs to go.png (1.92 MiB) Viewed 2141 times
-
- Run in 10 secs to go.png (1.7 MiB) Viewed 2141 times
-
- Run in 6 secs to go.png (1.84 MiB) Viewed 2141 times
Wing Commander Alan Johnson - RAFAir UK
- Richard Rodgers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 792
- Joined: 31 Dec 2012, 10:11
- Location: Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Alan, if you are using mk82 Air, set up as CCIP then fly in at 400 feet agl and pickle when the release pipper is bet 3 and 4 aircraft
Gp Captain Richard Rodgers - RAF Air UK
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
Thanks Richard; that is what I currently plan to do. However, I cannot understand why the CCRP is not working.
Wing Commander Alan Johnson - RAFAir UK
Re: Tues 30th Nov - Nalchik Strike Re-Run?
A pleasant day out! Again my weapons system (or possibly me) played up. Sorry to have missed the frequency call to Vaz Tower. But it highlights the need to get positive check-in after every change - I should have noticed the loud silence!
I suspect that the Su fighters' damage was difficult to analyse because they were set up as 'objects' rather than 'aircraft'. As a consequence we got no notification of how many we destroyed, and even the Tacview recording didn't show them, nor give results.
The sortie highlighted a number of training points, which I will try and lay out over the next few days. A lot of them will be hobby-horses of mine, but we can argue over them at leisure. While not a "fast-jet man", I did spend 2 and a bit tours leading JP formations at 240-300 kias low level. Much of the procedures we used in the JP are relevant to the A-10 and the operating speeds were very similar. I will also try and write-up an outline low-level formation scenario for us to discuss. Not exactly SOPs but rather a series of do's, dont's, and a few tips to make life easier.
I suspect that the Su fighters' damage was difficult to analyse because they were set up as 'objects' rather than 'aircraft'. As a consequence we got no notification of how many we destroyed, and even the Tacview recording didn't show them, nor give results.
The sortie highlighted a number of training points, which I will try and lay out over the next few days. A lot of them will be hobby-horses of mine, but we can argue over them at leisure. While not a "fast-jet man", I did spend 2 and a bit tours leading JP formations at 240-300 kias low level. Much of the procedures we used in the JP are relevant to the A-10 and the operating speeds were very similar. I will also try and write-up an outline low-level formation scenario for us to discuss. Not exactly SOPs but rather a series of do's, dont's, and a few tips to make life easier.
Wing Commander Alan Johnson - RAFAir UK