Operation low dangle v0.1

[fly_george]

this is a test for using an aggressor squadron and this mission is packed into a tight AO to provide high target density
briefing below


MISSION OVERVIEW
DATE: 01 June 2011
TIME: 08:00:00
SUNRISE: 06:09 (over bullseye)
SUNSET: 19:47 (over bullseye)

TASK: logistics disruption and elimination of indirect fire bases

MISSION COMMANDER: N/A

CARRIERS:
- CVN Stennis TCN 74X STN ICLS 11 COMM 127.5

COMM:
Common: 251.0
Senaki-Kolkhi
ATC: 132.0
NAV: TACAN TSK 31X
Kutaisi
ATC: 134.0
NAV: TACAN TSK 44X
Tanker / KC135MPRS / 18000 ft / Arco1 / Freq 252.000 / TCN:82X
Tanker / KC-135 / 16000 ft / Texaco1 / Freq 252.000 / TCN:83X
AWACS / Overlord1 / Freq 251.000 / TCN:


LZs: homebase senaki-kolkhi / divert kutaisi

PACKAGES
05390 [Tanker] Arco1 1xKC135MPRS

05749 [CAP] Pontiac1 4xFA-18C_hornet

05585 [Tanker] Texaco1 1xKC-135

05943 [AWACS] Overlord1 1xE-3A

05780 [CAS] Enfield1 4xAV8BNA

05140 [CAS] Hawg1 4xA-10C

05335 [CAS] Boar1 4xA-10C

05053 [SEAD] Springfield1 4xFA-18C_hornet

05888 [CAS] Enfield1 4xAV8BNA

05248 [Intercept] Uzi1 4xF-14B


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
the use of aim-120c and aim-9x is prohibited for this sortie

[fly_george]

more pics

[fly_george]

last pics

[fly_george]

last one i promise

[Neil Willis]

Have you tested it out with a bunch of us yet?

If it goes well, we can add it to the Tuesday night list.

Looks good.

[Mr_Sukebe]

I don't really understand what you mean by this being a test for an aggressor squadron.

Are you suggesting that the forces listed are the "good guys" and that there will be a secondary set of aircraft available for use by the aggressor squadron?
If so, do you have thoughts on what those aircraft should be?

[Muff]

Much interested of running as aggressor so sign me up for testing if u need

[fly_george]

I don't really understand what you mean by this being a test for an aggressor squadron.

Are you suggesting that the forces listed are the "good guys" and that there will be a secondary set of aircraft available for use by the aggressor squadron?
If so, do you have thoughts on what those aircraft should be?

these are the missions for the blue side. the aggressors will all be airstart cap flights, with aircraft including mig29a, su33, m2000, jf17, f5 and mig21, the su33 is the only one that I think may need to be removed as it is very advanced. the red pilots are there to get some good training in air to air engagements but mainly to offer a challenge without killing every blue pilot

[fly_george]

I don't really understand what you mean by this being a test for an aggressor squadron.

Are you suggesting that the forces listed are the "good guys" and that there will be a secondary set of aircraft available for use by the aggressor squadron?
If so, do you have thoughts on what those aircraft should be?

these are the missions for the blue side. the aggressors will all be airstart cap flights, with aircraft including mig29a, su33, m2000, jf17, f5 and mig21, the su33 is the only one that I think may need to be removed as it is very advanced. the red pilots are there to get some good training in air to air engagements but mainly to offer a challenge without killing every blue pilot

[fly_george]

ill be running a test soon with myself using an invulnerable aircraft